Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: What about those Optional Rules?

  1. #1
    Ordinary Seaman
    Sweden

    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Stockholm
    Log Entries
    29
    Name
    Pete

    Default What about those Optional Rules?

    Dear Gamers,

    In SoG there are a lot of Optional Rules to play with. I would like to ask you more experienced gamers on what O.R.s you prefer, or do you play them all? Are some of them in favour of any country, or are they well balanced? Is there one, or more, O.R.s you really dislike?

    Any hints on this subject will be very helpful.
    Thx


  2. #2

    Default

    I've been forming my own opinions

    Here's where I am right now:

    * Let The Men Drink = Fun!

    * Lacking Training = Very useful from a simulation/scenario-balance point of view, but it can be frustrating when you have to actually command badly trained sailors

    * Entanglement = Use it always, seems like a good, simple way of discouraging collisions

    * Continuous Fire = Don't use it, seems to be less fun to me. It's more realistic, of course, but I find the suspense and planning of broadside fire is more enjoyable

    * First Broadside = Don't use it. Already too many chits flying around. A ship can start double-shotted if it wants, and that could be a form of first-shot advantage.

    * Forced Aim = As written it doesn't seem to work well. But I don't like "thread the needle" shots either. I'm still struggling to come up with a compromise that seems to address all situations.

    * Double Shot = Use it sometimes

    * Aiming High = It doesn't seem like a tactic I would use much, so I haven't taken the time to learn and apply it. In principle it's fine

    * Boarding = Well, it seems like you need to have it. But it hasn't come up in my games all that often. It seems to work ok.

    * Flagship = Haven't used it, not sure how well I like it. It isn't something I've read about having a big effect on battles

    * Sinking Ships, Spreading Fires = Like the idea of these, but haven't chosen to use it just to keep the complexity down

    * Surrendered Ships = I use and like this, they shouldn't just disappear

    * Variable Wind = In principle I like this. In practice I mostly don't use it, because it's an added thing to remember and keep track of.

    * Terrain/Forts = Good stuff


    My $0.02

  3. #3
    Midshipman
    Netherlands

    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Noord Brabant
    Log Entries
    158
    Name
    Thijs

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fredmiracle View Post
    I've been forming my own opinions

    Here's where I am right now:

    * Let The Men Drink = Fun!

    * Lacking Training = Very useful from a simulation/scenario-balance point of view, but it can be frustrating when you have to actually command badly trained sailors

    * Entanglement = Use it always, seems like a good, simple way of discouraging collisions

    * Continuous Fire = Don't use it, seems to be less fun to me. It's more realistic, of course, but I find the suspense and planning of broadside fire is more enjoyable

    * First Broadside = Don't use it. Already too many chits flying around. A ship can start double-shotted if it wants, and that could be a form of first-shot advantage.

    * Forced Aim = As written it doesn't seem to work well. But I don't like "thread the needle" shots either. I'm still struggling to come up with a compromise that seems to address all situations.

    * Double Shot = Use it sometimes

    * Aiming High = It doesn't seem like a tactic I would use much, so I haven't taken the time to learn and apply it. In principle it's fine

    * Boarding = Well, it seems like you need to have it. But it hasn't come up in my games all that often. It seems to work ok.

    * Flagship = Haven't used it, not sure how well I like it. It isn't something I've read about having a big effect on battles

    * Sinking Ships, Spreading Fires = Like the idea of these, but haven't chosen to use it just to keep the complexity down

    * Surrendered Ships = I use and like this, they shouldn't just disappear

    * Variable Wind = In principle I like this. In practice I mostly don't use it, because it's an added thing to remember and keep track of.

    * Terrain/Forts = Good stuff


    My $0.02
    Uhm I have to agree with Fred

  4. #4

    Default

    I have used a number of O.R. in my games. For large convention games you may want to keep it simple; however some are indispensable IMO and some are helpful more in particular scenarios (islands, forts and reefs for example). Quick list: Boarding and Entanglement are a must! (entanglement in particular since I use a house rule for collisions), Let the Men Drink, surrendered ships (what Fred said!), double shot and these are useful for scenario balance; Lacking Training, Flagship and the Ability cards.

    I have not used Continuous Fire, Forced Aim or Variable Wind for the reasons Fred mentioned.

    Eric

  5. #5
    Midshipman
    Germany

    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    BW
    Log Entries
    180
    Name
    Matthias

    Default

    I like the Variable Wind Direction rule.
    In my opinion it's easy to made at the beginning of a new turn. And it brings some unexpected maneuvering into the game. Like in real sailing life.

    I don't like Double Shot (too complicated)
    And never (yet) used Aiming High, Flagship, Ammo Explosion, Sinking Ships, Spreading Fire, Surrendered Ships, Variable Wind Strength

    Too much optional rules makes the gaming stressfull for me.

  6. #6
    Ordinary Seaman
    Canada

    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    quebec
    Log Entries
    37
    Name
    Stephane

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fredmiracle View Post
    I've been forming my own opinions

    Here's where I am right now:

    * Let The Men Drink = Fun!

    * Lacking Training = Very useful from a simulation/scenario-balance point of view, but it can be frustrating when you have to actually command badly trained sailors

    * Entanglement = Use it always, seems like a good, simple way of discouraging collisions

    * Continuous Fire = Don't use it, seems to be less fun to me. It's more realistic, of course, but I find the suspense and planning of broadside fire is more enjoyable

    * First Broadside = Don't use it. Already too many chits flying around. A ship can start double-shotted if it wants, and that could be a form of first-shot advantage.

    * Forced Aim = As written it doesn't seem to work well. But I don't like "thread the needle" shots either. I'm still struggling to come up with a compromise that seems to address all situations.

    * Double Shot = Use it sometimes

    * Aiming High = It doesn't seem like a tactic I would use much, so I haven't taken the time to learn and apply it. In principle it's fine

    * Boarding = Well, it seems like you need to have it. But it hasn't come up in my games all that often. It seems to work ok.

    * Flagship = Haven't used it, not sure how well I like it. It isn't something I've read about having a big effect on battles

    * Sinking Ships, Spreading Fires = Like the idea of these, but haven't chosen to use it just to keep the complexity down

    * Surrendered Ships = I use and like this, they shouldn't just disappear

    * Variable Wind = In principle I like this. In practice I mostly don't use it, because it's an added thing to remember and keep track of.

    * Terrain/Forts = Good stuff


    My $0.02
    I use all but the following:
    Lacking training (not done any scenarios yet)
    Aiming high, just has not come to use yet
    Flagship, again I find it to be more of a scenario thing
    Terrain and forts, still more scenarios, but terrain could be fun, not just learned maneuvering enough yet to complicate it further

  7. #7
    Ordinary Seaman
    United States

    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Ohio
    Log Entries
    37
    Name
    Rob

    Default

    Boarding was the first optional rule that my son wanted us to use. It comes up in most of our games. We also use let the men drink, Entanglement, Surrendered Ships, and allow Double Shot. We just never seem to use Double Shot since it takes longer to load.

  8. #8

    Default

    Until now we only used the advanced rules and the optional rule:

    Let The Men Drink

  9. #9

    Default

    Here are the optional rules I've used at conventions:
    Let the Men Drink
    Entanglement
    Double Shot
    Aiming High
    Boarding
    Variable wind direction
    Terrain elements

  10. #10
    2nd Lieutenant
    Germany

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Nordrhein-Westfalen
    Log Entries
    727
    Name
    Ulrich

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Comte de Brueys View Post
    Until now we only used the advanced rules and the optional rule:

    Let The Men Drink
    Let the men drink is a very good rule.....

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •